How it all started
At the start of this millenium, comprehensive scientific curiosity started to emerge for me, and ever since that, I have been pursuing this curiosity to find answers to all scientific questions I could come up with.
Mathematics
Mathematics was the very first science I found myself curious about. Thanks to my mathematics teacher back then I was able to delve into mathematics quite intensively - "Fermats last theorem" was the very first book within this science that I binge-read.
As can be seen in the mathematics section, I occupied myself with quite a few aspects of mathematics. I consumed book after book, always came up with new questions, and all this eventually led me to physics.
As can be seen in the mathematics section, I occupied myself with quite a few aspects of mathematics. I consumed book after book, always came up with new questions, and all this eventually led me to physics.
Physics
By reading books about this science, I asked and answered more and more fundamental questions about our universe. I bought books like "Schrödingers Cat" and "E = mc²", but quickly got to books by Stephen Hawking (Rest in peace) and Michio Kaku, which - in my humble opinion - are some of the greatest minds of these days.
After about half a year, I (as far as possible) understood quantum mechanics, the principle of relativity, string theories and several more hypotheses, leading me to ask questions not only about our universe, but also about the area outside of it, even though we can't measure that right now.
But there was one thing I found to be rather annoying about the community of physicists: they seem to ignore the "Why?" consciously and only care about description of what's happening. I thought and still think that you can't get to the bottom of it all without asking WHY something is the way it is. Well, if some people voluntarily seal up one of their eyes and bind both of their arms on their back, they of course have the right to do so. But I will not follow this example and instead keep asking the why-question regarding every subject in every scientific discipline.
After about half a year, I (as far as possible) understood quantum mechanics, the principle of relativity, string theories and several more hypotheses, leading me to ask questions not only about our universe, but also about the area outside of it, even though we can't measure that right now.
But there was one thing I found to be rather annoying about the community of physicists: they seem to ignore the "Why?" consciously and only care about description of what's happening. I thought and still think that you can't get to the bottom of it all without asking WHY something is the way it is. Well, if some people voluntarily seal up one of their eyes and bind both of their arms on their back, they of course have the right to do so. But I will not follow this example and instead keep asking the why-question regarding every subject in every scientific discipline.
Medicine
For example questions about how and why certain substances have certain effects, about why several natural substances mostly have significantly less side effects in comparison to substances usually used in academic medicine. Or about why certain empirically found natural medicine findings - like for example that ascorbic acid selectively attacks tumor cells, while healthy cells don't take any damage from it - are seemingly never being used in academic medicine. Evolution had several orders of magnitude more time to develop and perfect the way all those nutrients or vital substances are being used, while academic medicine, which is mostly based on unnatural chemicals, simply does not have this headstart.
Of course, they're trying to get better, but how often do they really know WHY something has certain effects? Many substances are only being used because it is known THAT they do certain things - but in many of these cases, nobody knows exactly why they have those effects. There is a legion of medical researchers on this planet, but they rather test new unnatural substances on involuntary animals instead of finding out why certain substances have their according effects, which could even lead to ways to improve their effects. They could also use natural substances more, but for some reason most of them simply don't.
I for my part know by now, how unexpectedly strong the effects of certain natural substances really are - regardless of the majority of the masses no knowing about that - and that they can be used for several things where there are no true alternatives coming from academic medicine, since they only treat symptoms. On the other side: the body uses vital substances to (for the most part) fight causes instead of their symptoms.
Of course, they're trying to get better, but how often do they really know WHY something has certain effects? Many substances are only being used because it is known THAT they do certain things - but in many of these cases, nobody knows exactly why they have those effects. There is a legion of medical researchers on this planet, but they rather test new unnatural substances on involuntary animals instead of finding out why certain substances have their according effects, which could even lead to ways to improve their effects. They could also use natural substances more, but for some reason most of them simply don't.
I for my part know by now, how unexpectedly strong the effects of certain natural substances really are - regardless of the majority of the masses no knowing about that - and that they can be used for several things where there are no true alternatives coming from academic medicine, since they only treat symptoms. On the other side: the body uses vital substances to (for the most part) fight causes instead of their symptoms.
And more ...
These are the sciences I deal with most of the time - and whenever I criticize something in a certain scientific discipline, I deal with that according science in a way that I don't have to criticize myself as well. Among other things, this means that finding answers to the "Why?" question is my top priority usually, before I jump to answering other questions.
In addition there are several scientific disciplines dealing with nerve cells. So for example, it's verified that microtubules found inside nerve cells are ultimately responsible for nerve cells firing. Those microtubules do it due to quantum mechanical effects, most of all because of quantum noise. This could lead you to the esoteric question of what exactly it is that seems to linger inside quantum noise, from where it makes nerve cells fire and thus controls whole bodies. What exactly would those entities be called in religions again?
In addition there are several scientific disciplines dealing with nerve cells. So for example, it's verified that microtubules found inside nerve cells are ultimately responsible for nerve cells firing. Those microtubules do it due to quantum mechanical effects, most of all because of quantum noise. This could lead you to the esoteric question of what exactly it is that seems to linger inside quantum noise, from where it makes nerve cells fire and thus controls whole bodies. What exactly would those entities be called in religions again?